|
tenaspa said:
A writer once said "Russell T Davies envisioned a mainstream, commercial Who, primetime hit rather than fan indulgence, which meant a mainstream and commercial hero. Tennant’s character, like his costume, was pitched to be crowdpleasing, a matey, likeable leading man giving noughties viewers what they wanted. They fell for him, and so did his companions."
Smith was original and portrayed "the Doctor" really well. The number of companions does not correlate with how better of being the Doctor the actors are. In regards to the companions being copied and paste, I have one questions for you guys and gals: Have you seen all of Doctor Who? All of the companions are "pretty" and "clever." How the companions are picked is more or less a tradition that has been going on. People should not focused on the looks or the empty rhetorics that are made from looking at the surface. People should be more fascinated with the story, with the adventure, and most importantly, with all of the awesome -fantastic- lesson the doctor teaches us.
That is why I would say, after watching Doctor Who over and over and over again -with much enjoyment- Matt Smith is the best doctor in the new who.
I have not watched enough of the old who to determine the proper answer which one is the best.
|
|