Castle freaks of the world unite!
1013 fans
 Join this Club
Search Club:
 Invite friend 
fanpop > travel & places > castles > articles > opinion

Castles vs. Palaces

Opinion by WritersMelody posted 1 year ago
3.6
 by 6 fans
save Bookmark and Share
The two terms are not interchangeable. This soapbox is intended to help you learn to tell the difference if you can't already.

The primary difference is in architecture. Castles were built as forts; they have narrow windows, drawbridges, murder holes, etc. Dover Castle is an excellent example. Palaces were built as places of residence so they tend to be much more sprawling and lacking in drawbridges and barbicans.

Another difference is in location. Palaces were not built in hostile territory since they were intended to be residences whereas castles were used as outposts from which a lord could exercise control of the surrounding territory.

Castles and palaces could either be built in a city- like the one in Canterbury- or in more remote locations. What person doesn't like to have a place (or several) to retreat to when they need a break from things?

Hopefully this rather short soapbox has been useful!
URL:   Bookmark and Share
4 comments
user photo
ilovekud said:
very useful... i never really knew the difference ty
posted 1 year ago.
 
user photo
Lars said:
Yes. That is the english definitions.

But since the Svenska for Castle is 'Slott,' and that word also encompasses palaces, fortifications, and fortified manors... they are all welcome here.
posted 1 year ago.
 
user photo
What my husband said ;)

Welcome to the Castles & Other Cool Historical Fortified Buildings Spot.

HA!
posted 1 year ago.
 
user photo
also some castles serve as both?
posted 1 year ago.
 
related links
popular content
fanpop home - company blog - about us - advertise on fanpop - faq - sitemap - terms of service - privacy policy - contact us
connect with us on
Facebook MySpace bebo hi5 YouTube Twitter