|
Every girl deserves a fairy tale ending.
|
|
Invite friend
Her Prince Has Come. Critics, Too.
|
|
|||||
Princess Tiana, a hand-drawn throwback to classic Disney characters like Cinderella and Snow White, has a dazzling green gown, a classy upsweep hairdo and a diamond tiara. Like her predecessors, she is a strong-willed songbird (courtesy of the Tony-winning actress Anika Noni Rose) who finds her muscle-bound boyfriend against all odds. “Finally, here is something that all little girls, especially young black girls, can embrace,” Cori Murray, an entertainment director at Essence magazine, recently told CNN. To the dismay of Disney executives — along with the African-American bloggers and others who side with the company — the film is also attracting chatter of an uglier nature. Is “The Princess and the Frog,” set in New Orleans in the 1920s, about to vaporize stereotypes or promote them? The film, directed by Ron Clements and John Musker, two of the men behind “The Little Mermaid,” unfolds against a raucous backdrop of voodoo and jazz. Tiana, a waitress and budding chef who dreams of owning a restaurant, is persuaded to kiss a frog who is really a prince. The spell backfires and — poof! — she is also an amphibian. Accompanied by a Cajun firefly and a folksy alligator, the couple search for a cure. After viewing some photographs of merchandise tied to the movie, which is still unfinished, Black Voices, a Web site on AOL dedicated to African-American culture, faulted the prince’s relatively light skin color. Prince Naveen hails from the fictional land of Maldonia and is voiced by a Brazilian actor; Disney says that he is not white. “Disney obviously doesn’t think a black man is worthy of the title of prince,” Angela Bronner Helm wrote March 19 on the site. “His hair and features are decidedly non-black. This has left many in the community shaking their head in befuddlement and even rage.” Others see insensitivity in the locale. “Disney should be ashamed,” William Blackburn, a former columnist at The Charlotte Observer, told London’s Daily Telegraph. “This princess story is set in New Orleans, the setting of one of the most devastating tragedies to beset a black community.” ALSO under scrutiny is Ray the firefly, performed by Jim Cummings (the voice of Winnie the Pooh and Yosemite Sam). Some people think Ray sounds too much like the stereotype of an uneducated Southerner in an early trailer. Of course, armchair critics have also been complaining about the princess. Disney originally called her Maddy (short for Madeleine). Too much like Mammy and thus racist. A rumor surfaced on the Internet that an early script called for her to be a chambermaid to a white woman, a historically correct profession. Too much like slavery. And wait: We finally get a black princess and she spends the majority of her time on screen as a frog? “Because of Disney’s history of stereotyping,” said Michael D. Baran, a cognitive psychologist and anthropologist who teaches at Harvard and specializes in how children learn about race, “people are really excited to see how Disney will handle her language, her culture, her physical attributes.” Mr. Baran is reserving judgment and encourages others to do the same. But he added that the issue warrants scrutiny because of Disney’s outsize impact on children. “People think that kids don’t catch subtle messages about race and gender in movies, but it’s quite the opposite,” he said. Donna Farmer, a Los Angeles Web designer who is African-American and has two children, applauded Disney’s efforts to add diversity. “I don’t know how important having a black princess is to little girls — my daughter loves Ariel and I see nothing wrong with that — but I think it’s important to moms,” she said. “Who knows if Disney will get it right,” she added. “They haven’t always in the past, but the idea that Disney is not bending over backward to be sensitive is laughable. It wants to sell a whole lot of Tiana dolls and some Tiana paper plates and make people line up to see Tiana at Disney World.” Few people outside the company have seen footage of the movie. Among them are consultants like Oprah Winfrey, whom Disney asked for input on the racial aspects of the film and was cast as Tiana’s mother. (Movie theater owners and members of the N.A.A.C.P. have also been shown scenes, and the reactions, according to a Disney spokeswoman, were “extremely positive.”) Rather, fueling the debate are photos of related merchandise taken from a toy industry event, a one-minute teaser trailer and Disney’s enormous cultural impact The company wants to vanquish once and for all the whispers of racism that linger from stumbles in the past. Yes, “Dumbo” traded in black stereotypes in 1941 with its band of uneducated, pimp-hat-wearing crows. All the animals in “The Jungle Book” from 1967 speak in proper British accents except for the jive-talking monkeys who desperately want to become “real people.” Enlarge This Image Stephanie Diani for The New York Times ROYAL SUBJECTS Donna Farmer, with her children, applauds Disney's efforts. Enlarge This Image Disney Enterprises Inc. CHARGE! "Mulan" was celebrated in 1998 for portraying Chinese people with realistic-looking eyes. Readers' Comments Readers shared their thoughts on this article. Read All Comments (201) » More recently, “Aladdin” ran into trouble in 1993. The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee labeled certain song lyrics defamatory (“Where they cut off your ear/If they don’t like your face/It’s barbaric, but, hey, it’s home”). The company responds that criticism of such well-worn examples — particularly of films from the ’60s and earlier — applies a 21st-century morality to movies made in sharply different times. The United States barely had a Civil Rights Act in 1967, much less a black president. Disney executives think people should stop jumping to conclusions about “The Princess and the Frog.” A producer of the film, Peter Del Vecho, said: “We feel a great responsibility to get this right. Every artistic decision is being carefully thought out.” Ms. Rose, familiar to movie audiences for her role in “Dreamgirls,” has also defended Disney. “There is no reason to get up in arms,” she told reporters at a recent Los Angeles Urban League dinner. “If there was something that I thought was disrespectful to me or to my heritage, I would certainly not be a part of it.” Ms. Winfrey declined to comment. A spokesman for the N.A.A.C.P. said the organization had no immediate comment. Disney often gets criticized no matter how carefully it strives to put together its television shows, theme-park attractions and movies. For years, Disney has been lambasted by some parents for not having a black princess. Now, some of those same voices are taking aim at the company without seeing the finished product. (Officially, the princesses are Snow White, Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty, Ariel of “The Little Mermaid,” Belle of “Beauty and the Beast” and Jasmine of “Aladdin” — all white except for Jasmine, who is Arabian. The leads from “Mulan” and “Pocahontas” are sometimes sold with the Princess merchandising line.)
|
||||||
| connect with us on | |||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Join this Club
So? If it was a white princess that got turned into a frog, no one would care. If anyone thinks it's racist, then they're racist themselves for even thinking that.
--
“Disney obviously doesn’t think a black man is worthy of the title of prince,” Angela Bronner Helm wrote March 19 on the site. “His hair and features are decidedly non-black. This has left many in the community shaking their head in befuddlement and even rage.”"
^ That quote above, is the most PATHETIC thing I have ever read. Sorry but it is... it's like people just look for the bad points. Argh, it's really made me angry.
Why can't people just watch a movie and enjoy it? It's only a kids movie... who cares about stereotypes/racism? The only racism I can see is that of the people who think it's racist! For example, that stupid woman 'Angela Bronner Helm'
Disney obviously doesnt mean any harm.. they've finally made a black Princess so to be honest, WHATS THE BIG DEAL?!
Sorry, it's hard to explain. It sounded much better in my head..
Thanks for posting it though!! :)
^^ not true. the only proper english speaking characters in the Jungle Book are Shere Khan and Bagheera. Kaa, Baloo, and Mowgli all are American actors. The monkey is played by Louis Prima, an Italian-American, and in no way black, famous musician. So the monkeys are not black.
As usual, people are overreacting.
I am (as you can probably tell) a HUGE fan of Disney, but I have to put my hands up and say that in the past a lot of Disney's movies had aspects that where stereotypical to races, calling it racism is too far, but they where diffinatley stereotypical both positively and negatively.
I agree with Mongoose, I don't think that The Princess and the Frog is being either stereotypical or racist at all.. at least what I have seen of it so far.
From what I've seen children usually only make an issue out of race if the adults around them do so, surely it sends a better message to treat Tiana the same as all the other princesses rather than to make the movie more about her colour than her personality. None of the white princesses are examined this closely, nor are their movies or the movie's historical accuracy, so what message does it send to treat Tiana differently? Those critics are the ones treating the character differently based on her skin colour, to me they are the ones being racist. Also, what kind of message does it send to movie makers to put Disney under intense, negative scrutiny for doing a black princess? It sends the negative message that it's easier and will get less criticism to just do white leading characters, and we don't want that. Being mad because it's set in New Orleans? should we pretend New Orleans doesn't exist because a bad thing happened there? How is that positive? And to the people who think it sends a bad message to have her love interest not be black, how about the fact that it sends the message that love is more important than skin colour, and that you should be with who you want regardless of their race? Last time I checked that was a positive message to send.
My little sister is really excited to see the movie, and she isn't going to look at Tiana and think 'That princess is a different race' she's going to be watching the movie the same way she would watch any princess movie, and seeing Tiana the way she'd see any princess, and so will I. I think that's how everyone should watch the movie and see it for what it is, a kids film, rather than going in there looking for things to be mad about. Tiana's a beautiful character, and the clips I've seen make the movie look fun and well done.
Sign In or join Fanpop to add your comment