We apologize for the missing images - one of our image servers went offline and we're working on a recovery solution.
For more information, click here to read a forum thread on this.
Because the web should revolve around you
2079 fans
 Join this Spot
Search Fanpop:
 Invite friend 
fanpop > technology & science > fanpop > articles > guide

SAVE ME! I was trolled! ...or was I?

save
Guide by Snerkie posted 4 months ago
4.1
 by 34 fans
You rated:
Right, well the title is a bit sarcastic. The whole "trolling" thing is sorta annoying me that having a low rate on something HAS to mean you were trolled...well maybe there's a different reason. I'll break it up to why that might not have been a trolling...

Soapboxes
- Did you use proper grammar? Check your spelling
- What's a paragraph? Learn how to use paragraphs properly to make your soapbox formatted and not look like a 1 star article
- They may not agree or think your opinion is totally outrageous...not a trolling

Images
- Would you like that quality of a picture? Try and avoid small and bad quality looking images
- Credit? People will go and give you bad ratings if you don't credit
- Keywords, keywords, keywords...make them useful, using a few duplicates puts a frown on lots of faces

Videos
- Same from images, keywords are essential
- They video may not work (or they don't realise they have to click the lil blue arrow
- Is it in english? always helps or is the video in sync? (lips move when sound comes)

Links
- Would the link help you? If it wouldn't it might not be helping them and they're just letting others know
- Does the link go to the correct page? Sending someone off to different page from the title could result in bad rating


These are just a few things as to why you might have a bad rating on something. You didn't get trolled so put that knife down, they just might not agree with your opinion. Not the end of the world, at least they viewed your content which is something that's nice to know and I promise you that you won't die.
10 comments
user photo harold said:
I'd rate this higher, but it's a little brief (another criterion for articles, along with original content). Bravo, in any case. The anti-troll rhetoric here bothers me a bit, too...not so much because differing opinions are viewed as troll behavior (though that is irritating), but because virulent hysteria against even genuine trolls is as offensive as the original troll behavior. Rise above, folks, don't fight fire with fire.
posted 4 months ago.
 
user photo DrDevience said:
Yep!

If you have no image credit, or little to no keywords on anything... then that low rating may very well have been from me. I take no prisoners!
posted 4 months ago.
 
user photo ineedcoffee said:
Also if it is a duplicate, no need to have the same image or video more than once unless the video is broken but then the broken one should be taken down.
posted 4 months ago.
 
user photo Snerkie said:
good points :) usually i remember about duplicates because that frustrates me a bit (especially when the two are on the same page :\)
posted 4 months ago.
 
user photo amazondebs said:
two on the same page? wow that is bad
i do like to help in the troll squad but if something is reported and i go and look at it, i will still rate it fairly
in fact i gave you a 4 snerkie as it's good and very honest but like harold said a wee bit brief
posted 4 months ago.
last edited 4 months ago
 
user photo knifewrench said:
"- They may not agree or think your opinion is totally outrageous...not a trolling"

If you base you're ratings on you're own opinion rather than the quality of the content then that is an unfair rating; maybe not trolling but a bad rating none the less. It just turns into YouTube's thumbs-up/thumbs-down comment system.

Other than that you hit the nail on the head: crap content can't be trolled ;)
posted 4 months ago.
last edited 4 months ago
 
user photo Snerkie said:
yeah but it's still not trolling :P lol. It is a bad way of rating if someone rates by a negative opinion (ie. i hate this character so 1 star) but then there's the opinion side of "you have no idea what you're talking about and didn't even research" 1 star. So it can be taken two ways.
posted 4 months ago.
 
user photo hooch-is-crazy said:
and then there's whether comments are trolling, i once saw one of you're comments that wasn't much more than a disagreement being called troll comments.
posted 4 months ago.
 
user photo Cinders said:
These are some excellent points, Snerkie. A few more about soapboxes: If it's not original content, or if it's short enough to be a forum post, I will generally rate it lower.

And SERIOUSLY about the images, guys-- I see so many without even key words lately! Work on that, people! My god!
posted 4 months ago.
 
user photo maybeastarbucks said:
Took the words right out of my mouth. Good article.
posted 4 months ago.
 
related links