Queen of the Damned
The Mother Of All Vampires
|
|
Invite friend
|
an icon was added: Queen of the Damned | 23 days ago by adwbuffy |
|
a comment was made to the pop quiz question: why has akasha truely awaken for, what is here plans for earth. | 23 days ago by nomalic |
|
a pop quiz question was added: why has akasha truely awaken for, what is here plans for earth. | 23 days ago by nomalic |
|
|
a comment was made to the fan pick question: Which of these is your case when it comes to this film? | 2 months ago by sapherequeen |
| more updates >> |
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
| more queen of the damned answers >> |
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
| more queen of the damned picks >> |
Fans of Anne Rice's The Vampire Chronicles and everything related to them.
|
|||||
I decided to make this thing very clear. And why can't I just let people pair Lestat and Jesse if it makes them happy? Can you really say living in a lie is a good thing anyway?
|
|||||
|
|||||
Lestat & Akasha is number 7
|
|||||
Fan Club / Spot for fans of these two characters and their father-son relationship.
|
| more queen of the damned links >> |
Excerpt:
Basically I mean this to just anyone who's interested (and maybe targetted at those who adore this film and think they could not have done better.) Some lovers of this film say; "it was only inspired by the books, so there was no need for it to be any closer to them" - but that is so not true. They do not mean us to think of this as only an inspired work and they did not work on this as such - the producer's words quoted in this article, make that very clear. And some lovers say; "of course it can not be exactly like the books". Well, true enough but it could have... |
|||
Excerpt:
The points I'm going to argue / comment on: X How his performance as Lestat / any character supposedly sucks. X He didin't even read the books when he took the role of Lestat. X How he in the first place took such a crappy role in a crappy script. X Being drunk on the set / made up accent and bragging about them. X He supposedly acted surprised twice for the same reason in the film. Now, when you put all that in that way and even leave it at that - sure as hell it sounds downright ridiculous and awful. But why don't we take a deeper look at all that?... |
|||
Excerpt:
I don't think it'd hurt to publish this matter as an article too... Seeing to how blind so many people are to this in the name of "It didn't go like that in the books!!!" So, let us look into the books to see if it might make sense. But before that - let me explain: In the film; The producer of the film in F.A.Q at Warner Bros's QOTD site: "Marius makes Lestat for the sake of economy. It happens to work extremely well from a character-motivation point of view.” |
| more articles >> |
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
| skip question |
|
||
|
||
|
| more >> |
| connect with us on | |||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
Join this Club
add video
adwbuffy 
write article
