Game...set...match.
977 fans
 Join this Club
Search Club:
 Invite friend 
fanpop > sports & recreation > tennis > forum > agassi's better than sampras...

Agassi's better than Sampras...

kevinkchew posted on Mar 10, 2007 at 12:14AM
...because he won on every surface. Sampras is overrated. Anyone agree or disagree?

user photo
Disagree strongly. Sampras owned not only because of his brilliance but because of his versatility. Pete Sampras is the best Tennis player of all time, agassi isn't even in the top ten.
posted 2 years ago.
 
user photo
dave said:
Yeah Kevin, I'd have to agree, Agassi was good and I loved him as a player, but Pete was better. Head-to-head Pete beat out Andre 20-14. Andre never dominated the sport the way Pete did. What I'm curious about is whether Pete is better than Roger Federer who I think could be the best player of all time.
posted 2 years ago.
last edited 2 years ago
 
user photo
dusty said:
Sampras was better than Agassi it is true. Agassi could be a top ten player of all time. He did win each of the majors, and had 8 slams overall. I'm with Dave when he says that Federer could be the best of all time. He hasn't won the French yet (Sampras never did either), but once he does he will be the best.
posted 2 years ago.
last edited 2 years ago
 
user photo
I think Agassi has more raw talent than Sampras. Besides, he's a lot more fun to watch in my opinion.
posted 2 years ago.
 
user photo
dusty said:
Agassi was WAY more fun to watch than Sampras. Pete could bore you to death.
posted 2 years ago.
 
user photo
agassi's not even in the top 10?? that's just offensive. federer is/will be the greatest of all time. he makes everyone look foolish.
posted 2 years ago.
 
Add Your Reply

Sign in or join fanpop to add your reply

related clubs
popular content
fanpop home - company blog - about us - advertise on fanpop - faq - sitemap - terms of service - privacy policy - contact us
connect with us on
Facebook MySpace bebo hi5 YouTube Twitter