Debate Club
Join
Fanpop
New Post
Explore Fanpop
posted by Cinders
"Purple Politics" by Dan May
"Purple Politics" by Dan May
All right, so you probably saw this in your update and thought, "Oh, interesting," and then saw it was written by Cinders, and now you expect something sarcastic. But no, I am being very serious. Even as a self-described liberal, I do love conservatives, I want conservatives in this spot to SPEAK UP and I am going to tell you why.

I have very strong opinions, as I am sure many of you are familiar. Some of you agree with the things I say, some of you don't. And I welcome both reactions to the things I have to say, especially if you disagree. As I call myself a liberal, those who tend to disagree with me call themselves conservatives. Whether or not either one of us adheres 100% to the labels we assign ourselves is beside the point. Liberals and conservatives have been two halves of a feuding family for years-- but they are still a family. Which is why I decided to compile this list.

Why I Love Conservatives

1) Dissent. A person might believe that if everyone thought the same way she does, then the world would be a better place. In fact, several people believe this. Some hypothesize that agreement on morals, laws, and justice would eliminate, or at least greatly improve, a lot of the world's problems, and therefore consider a world where everyone thinks the same way, and agrees on everything as ideal. Conservatives wish for a conservative world, and liberals wish for a liberal world, and perhaps moderates wish for a world where everyone would just be moderate. But the fact of the matter is, this world is a better place because not everyone agrees with each other. If there was no such thing as dissent, then there would never be anyone proposing ways in which something could be done better.

Let's take economics for example. Perhaps someone proposes a plan that, in our "ideal world," everyone thinks this is a brilliant idea and it is immediately implemented. What if that plan is not working as well as it should, even though everyone thinks it's brilliant? What if there was a plan that worked better? This ideal world would never know, because they're only looking at the problem through one perspective. And so, the economy crashes. Now, what do you do?

All the economists gather together to propose a solution and swiftly agree on one within minutes. But as no one was around to question it, the solution is filled with holes that no one has ever considered how to fix. Already, this ideal world is suffering.

2) Diversity. All right, all right, I know that liberals tend to be seen as the champions of this thing called "diversity," but really it is a beautiful thing. Can you imagine the types of conversations you would have if everyone constantly agreed with you? Would you ever really listen to them, knowing you thought the exact same way? How could you connect? How could you grow, intellectually? If I had only liberal friends, or only talked to liberal friends, I probably would never have developed the strong convictions I currently have. Why? Because my ideas would have never been challenged. I would have never had to defend them, and therefore I would have never had to think about them, really, at all. Diversity, both in thinking and experiences, helps us all to learn and grow smarter.

3) Sometimes, they're right. I know, you're gobsmacked by this, aren't you? What I mean is, regardless of how strong my convictions are, if I walked around refusing to listen to other opinions, I might never find out that something I believe has a problem with it. I'll provide an example: I used to be very pro-choice. Now-- don't get me wrong-- I still am, only less so. The conservatives, in my opinion, have a lot of very good points on this subject, good enough to make me reconsider what I meant by pro-choice. I am now very strict and specific about what I think abortion laws should be.

The thing is, when I debate, people tend to say to me, "You claim you listen, you're open-minded, but you aren't agreeing with me!" or something to that effect. Which is why I always encourage the way of debating with the intent of understanding, and being understood. NOT to change your opponent's opinion. If you seek to change your opponent's opinion, you aren't respecting that opinion. I am of the belief (and yes, even this belief has been questioned!), that every opinion that has been carefully considered and constructed (IE, not regurgitated from what parents/friends believe) deserves respect. There is more than one way to look at the world, after all.

And it is for this reason, and many more, that I enjoy my discussions with conservatives like the dear MajorDork74, who seems to have been scared off from this place. While I challenge your beliefs, I of course fully expect you to challenge mine in return. And while I defend mine, I expect you to listen, as I will listen while you defend yours.

I am a lot of talk, I suppose. I do believe it was a user on this spot who accused me of intolerance. So perhaps rather than TELLING you how I act, perhaps I should ask: Do I intimidate you? Do I offend you? Do you feel like I don't listen to you, or that I don't respect you? If so, please-- let me know. Post a link where you feel like I crossed some line. Because while I would like to be respectful, I fully recognize that sometimes I am not, and request that I be corrected when this error occurs.

And it is at this point that I refer you to an link sixth months ago, detailing my intention for this spot.
added by Cinders
Source: Yahoo! Answers, Citizens of GA
added by nosemuffin
Source: rsf.org
added by nosemuffin
Source: www.thismodernworld.com
added by lunchboxdude
Source: rightwingstuff.com
Let us debate!
Let us debate!
Should projects involving eminent domain require citizen approval?

No, projects involving eminent domain should NOT require citizen approval.

Let me first state that eminent domain is not a nice rule. I understand that people would want a say in that.

However, that law is there to do things for the public good. People hardly think about the public good when it is about their own property.

Allowing some form of citizen approval would slow down the governments plans, which cost money that the citizens pay. A government should be able to work as efficient as possible with the laws that are in place.



Read our first round link
Writing About Religion and Sex by Tamika Lamison via FilmCourage.com.
video
debate
religion
writing
controversy
film
movies
women
added by ThePrincesTale
I know nobody ever watches these, but THIS ONE'S FUNNY, I SWEAR. Austin Bragg & Andrew Heaton make up fun nicknames for congressmen and show how Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook hearing should've gone. Reason TV, April 2018.
video
debate
issues
government
regulation
censorship
hearing
facebook
mark zuckerberg
andrew heaton
austin bragg
reason
parody
2018
added by tamore
Source: LIORA K PHOTOGRAPHY
added by tamore
added by harpyr
This student was asking a question of John Kerry in 2007 in a belligerent manner and ended up being dragged away and then tasered. I've posted a pick about it for discussion here- link
video
politics
university of florida
taser
kerry
bro
andrew meyer
added by kateliness2
Source: MarcelloSendos
added by TheGamer007
Source: binaryharmony.com
Credit: TheYoungTurks
video
theyoungturks
wells fargo
cancer
health insurance
added by tamore
Source: Tumblr
added by Dragonclaws
Descriptions of problems with gathering accurate statistics on human trafficking.
video
human trafficking
sex trafficking
statistics
added by amazondebs
Source: bushflash.com
added by zanhar1
video
added by adavila
Source: special4u.net
added by Cinders
Source: e horne and j comeau