I’m not here to argue the entire moral spectrum of Nudity, but I am going to make a statement about what kind of nude pictures are tolerable, or can be tolerable. The following is a list of completely nude female characters that do not require censorship because, while they are nude, they do not reveal private body parts.
link
link
link
link
Now I don’t know about everyone but I don’t remember being told by someone that the nude pictures I’ve drawn of my characters were sexual. Never once have I been told to remove them either. In the same way, characters like Sally Acorn, and Barby Koala, who don’t cover, aren’t revealing either.
That’s one of the great things about mobian characters. They don’t need covering because it doesn’t show unless the plot demands it (*coughrougeli’endacough*), and never has it been shown when nude, but actually when clothed. And even then, when clothed there was no penis, anus, or nipple, in sight.
Are two circles between the chest, or a line between the legs and rear, really mandatory to draw a perfect beautiful picture? I certainly don’t think so. Clothing or not, it adds very little to someone who wants to make something “beautiful” and a great deal to people who aren’t going to appreciate such revealing imagery.
Now in the event that I am told my pictures are too sexual, I can completely understand why someone would think that, and even if I feel that they aren’t, I know that my character doesn’t need to be nude to have its full potential. To me, it’s more important that I consider the mental purity of another person, rather than going with what I want.
Clothing isn’t the enemy, and you can be just as creative and flamboyant and beautiful by using clothing, as you can with the body itself. I like to combine the two when I can.
Basically what I am saying here is that you can still draw the bodily shape, but you do not have to draw the body parts no one should see. Shaped breasts, rear, rear-cracks, privates, nipples, these are not mandatory.
Take that as you will. This isn’t a challenge, this is an explanation and an outreach for resolution.
Thank you and God Bless
link
link
link
link
Now I don’t know about everyone but I don’t remember being told by someone that the nude pictures I’ve drawn of my characters were sexual. Never once have I been told to remove them either. In the same way, characters like Sally Acorn, and Barby Koala, who don’t cover, aren’t revealing either.
That’s one of the great things about mobian characters. They don’t need covering because it doesn’t show unless the plot demands it (*coughrougeli’endacough*), and never has it been shown when nude, but actually when clothed. And even then, when clothed there was no penis, anus, or nipple, in sight.
Are two circles between the chest, or a line between the legs and rear, really mandatory to draw a perfect beautiful picture? I certainly don’t think so. Clothing or not, it adds very little to someone who wants to make something “beautiful” and a great deal to people who aren’t going to appreciate such revealing imagery.
Now in the event that I am told my pictures are too sexual, I can completely understand why someone would think that, and even if I feel that they aren’t, I know that my character doesn’t need to be nude to have its full potential. To me, it’s more important that I consider the mental purity of another person, rather than going with what I want.
Clothing isn’t the enemy, and you can be just as creative and flamboyant and beautiful by using clothing, as you can with the body itself. I like to combine the two when I can.
Basically what I am saying here is that you can still draw the bodily shape, but you do not have to draw the body parts no one should see. Shaped breasts, rear, rear-cracks, privates, nipples, these are not mandatory.
Take that as you will. This isn’t a challenge, this is an explanation and an outreach for resolution.
Thank you and God Bless
This is the only picture i have of her right now, but her outlook doesn't change that much aside from her eyes going purple and orchid when Sally is in her spirit form.
This is what Splice typically looks like.
So why am I remaking it? Well the series was the first fanfiction series I made and when I did it wasn’t really well written, plotholes galore, so I wanted to remake it completely. But at the same time I didn’t want to redo it because of all the ideas I had.
So what I’m doing is rewriting the story, and keeping it as it was, but making some changes along the way. This way the original story will be there but it will be written better. I’ll add some other parts into it, but rest assured it’s not a reboot, just an edited version.
So what I’m doing is rewriting the story, and keeping it as it was, but making some changes along the way. This way the original story will be there but it will be written better. I’ll add some other parts into it, but rest assured it’s not a reboot, just an edited version.
Courtesy of Tak The Fox
