|
Cinders said:
I had no judgment on Dumbledore's sexuality whatsoever. He was the wise old mentor figure - you don't really think about his romantic life much. I mean, did you ever think about Obi Wan Kenobi's love life, or Yoda's?
In any case, it made the story about Grindewald far more convincing, and that was all I cared about. If Dumbledore was just good friends with Grindewald, I feel that wouldn't stop him from seeing the EVIL in Grindewald's actions. Harry would recognize if Ron went Death Eater, wouldn't he? But love... love unfortunately can make it hard to see the flaws in our lover. If he was in love with Grindewald, then his blindness to Grindewald's plans is much more plausible.
It fit with the story, and it was subtle, and if I recall, the only reason she even said he was gay was because people kept asking who the love of his life was, and she couldn't say "Grindewald" without revealing his sexuality.
Honestly, I think too big a deal was made about this. Activists celebrated it way too much, and anti-gay advocates condemned it way to harshly.
It's a fictional character. His sexuality doesn't matter. Rowling was trying to answer the questions people bombarded her with about her character. That's all.
|
|