Lilly and Humphrey

LillyOmega2 Biggest questions about this: 1, Why is Lilly with Humphrey? 2. Could those pups be her's and Garth's? A friend brought that possibility of them being Lilly and Garth's pups, but I fail to see how they look like either of them. They look like recolors of Fleet and Magril.

LoneOmega They may be Lilly and Garth's pups... They are re-skining most of the 3D models of the movie ...

LillyOmega2 Just like that female you asked if it was Candy. It's not. It's a wolf who you could see dancing on the side of the Howling Rock near the end of the first, and one of the rogues who got crapped on by Marcel and Paddy in A&O2. I wonder why she'd be in Jasper Park again since she's a rogue. Edit: Of course, that is the same character since they never changed her color. She was gray-white in the first and the second, and she is in the trailer of the fourth.

Kitsune32 At least Lilly's gonna be in it.

LillyOmega2 Good point. And Humphrey actually looks good in this movie. There's a screenshot of him in the related images box next to this comment box, and he looks just like how he did in the first. So does Lilly, only they both look older. I didn't expect that much of an improvement in animation. If Princess is in the movie, then I doubt I'll have any complaints. I am irked that it didn't show Princess in the trailer, but another rogue wolf from Banff...

LIL-Humphrey Well the pup on the right looks a lot like garth .. so this could realy be garth's and lilly's pups. Lilly looks older ... she looks much more mature ... sexy mother?

TimberHumphrey am i the only one who thinks the animation in A&O 4 looks great?

LillyOmega2 @TimberHumphrey: I do, too. I think it looks just like the animation of the original. I know it's gonna be great, but now if it would just be 90 minutes then I'd have no complaints at all.

TimberHumphrey hopefully, but i think its gonna 45 mins again. also, a few critics bashed the animation of A&O 1

Kitsune32 I wonder why.

LillyOmega2 True, but look how much it improved over the second and third's animation. I don't get why the animation (or the movie itself) was bashed. If they want terrible animation, they should judge that Rodeside Romeo or what it's called. I could list a few more movies that deserve the title of having terrible animation. None of the Alpha and Omega movies get that. Not saying that the sequels don't deserve the positive reviews they got, but I don't get how they got more positive reviews than the original when there were more things wrong with them. Mostly the running time and animation of 2 & 3, and a bit of the acting in third. But it looks like the acting and animation was fixed. Whoever it is that replaced Justin Long and Christina Ricci sound exactly like them in the trailer. That wasn't the case with Lilly in the second or with Humphrey in the third. That bear's voice (Brent, I think) was the worst thing about the sequels when it came to acting. Wouldn't have known that he also voice Fleet, if I remember right. The voices are so different.

TimberHumphrey critics are just assholes who want a movie to b 100% flawless and perfect. also the reason why A&O 2 and 3 get better reviews (according to critics) is that "they have better jokes". that's wat critics said. now, i loved both sequels, but i gotta disagree with them cause even though the sequels didn't have sex jokes, they were still the same with the first movie. (rating of the sequels = A&O 2: 55%; A&O 3: 45%)

Kitsune32 I don't think the animation of the first one was bad at all.

LillyOmega2 Critics said the sequels have better jokes? I don't even recall any other than Garth's reference to tall grass in A&O2 and when Fleet ended up in the bush with Claudette looking down at him in A&O3. Even for someone who doesn't like very many comedy movies, I thought the first had the best humor of the three. And, each sequel had one sex joke. Garth's line "The [i]really[/i] tall grass" is the one in the second. And the scene above I described involving Claudette and Fleet is the one in the third. I agree with the second being exactly the same as the first, but the difference between the first and the third is the first was more serious. Then again, considering the plot explains why. The packs aren't at war with each other like in the first two. I'm just really used to more serious animated movies, so the third was kind of a shock to me with how different it was. @Kitsune: I don't think the animation was bad in any of the movies, not even in the second. Up to the 4th movie, the second was my favorite sequel in terms of any animation. Well, it still is my favorite sequel for about anything, but we're just talking about animation, so...(that'll probably change when A&O4 is released).

Kitsune32 Agreed