Debate Club
Join
Fanpop
New Post
Explore Fanpop
posted by kateliness2
Young Abolitionist
Young Abolitionist
    In most people’s minds, April 8th 2002 was a day like any other. But on that day Ray Krone was released from death row in Arizona. DNA evidence had proven him innocent of the 1991 murder of a bartender in Phoenix. Mr. Krone was special because he was the 100th person released from death row since 1973 after new evidence had proven him innocent (“A Question of Innocence”). Throughout many years, the death penalty has been a controversial issue that calls into question a number of factors. The death penalty is ineffective at deterring criminals, keeping costs down and granting true justice.
    Many people believe that it is more expensive to keep criminals in jail than to put them to death. However, evidence proves this untrue. In a criminal justice system examination in Texas, the results concluded that, on average, the cost of putting someone to death in their state was about $2.3 million. Florida spends around $3.2 million on each execution. North Carolina usually squanders over $2.2 million for each prisoner sentenced to death. Yet, the average cost of keeping someone in a maximum security prison for 80 years, longer than most live, is about $1.5 million (Porter). These statistics tell that it is a great deal more expensive to execute criminals rather than sentencing them to life in prison and an unnecessary expense at that.

    Beyond expense, few people know that capital punishment is not a deterrent to crime. Common sense often causes people to forget that most murders are committed in
the “heat of the moment.” Not thinking of the consequences of their actions, these people commit crimes that could cost them their life in most states. The United States has a high execution rate. Yet it fails to have a low homicide rate. Put another way: In the 1990s, the average murder rate was 9.3 people per 100,000. Fifteen states were over this average (Death Penalty Information Center). All 15 states permitted capital punishment! According to William J. Bowers, author of Legal Homicide, “The point is that the way we have carried out executions historically in the United States appears to have contributed slightly but significantly to the increase of homicides” (Death Penalty Arguments). There is no point to having capital punishment sentences if it doesn’t deter crime.
    Aside from the fact that the death penalty increases the number of homicides, there is the factor of discrimination. Discrimination still exists today; no one can deny this. Obviously, this can play a factor in how a trial ends if the jury is prejudice. But few people know just how much of a role it can play. According to Samuel Gross and Robert Mauro, racial inequality experts and authors of Death and Discrimination, “It is no small comment on our society that we openly and consciously tolerate a system in which race frequently determines whom we execute and whom we spare.” If an African-American murders a Caucasian in Oklahoma, s/he is 10.1% more likely to receive a death sentence than a Caucasian murdering a Caucasian. Under the same circumstances, in North Carolina, s/he is 6% more likely to receive death. In Mississippi s/he is 20.8% more likely to be executed; in Virginia, s/he is 6.9% more likely to die, and in Arkansas, s/he is 10.5% more likely to receive death. Also, since 1976, almost 40% of executions have happened to African-Americans, although African-Americans only account for 13% of the population. Last year, 89% of death sentences had Caucasian victims, even when 50% of homicide victims were African-American (Porter). Although most probably made the unfortunate mistake of murder, they may be sentenced because of a choice they did not make, the color of their skin.
    Making mistakes is something everyone does. The justice system, the police and even the people who collect evidence all make mistakes. The government that prides itself on a system of checks and balances makes mistakes. It is irrational to let the government have the power to give punishment that cannot be undone. What gives fellow humans the power to decide if another’s life is not worth living anymore? They shouldn’t have the ability to decide that there is no going back and that this person will never be able to contribute to society again. Life is the most precious gift anyone can ever receive. There is hardly ever any way to be 100% positive that a person is guilty of a capital crime and to take away this life is irresponsible and immoral. Studies made by Hugo Adam Bedau and Michael L. Radelet, authors of Miscarriages of Justices in Potentially Capital Cases, show that 350 people convicted of felonies in the United States between 1900 and 1985 were innocent. Twenty-three of these innocent people were executed (“Death Penalty Facts” and “Uniform Crime Reports”). That is 23 innocent lives that were taken because of the death penalty. Not saved, taken. In the introduction, it was stated that Mr. Ray Krone was the 100th person released from death row after later evidence found him not guilty of the crime. Waiting to die, he wasted 11 years of his life on death row for a crime he did not commit. Well, there have been 23 more people released from death row since then because of new evidence (“To Kill or Not to Kill”). “In many cases, it was good fortune rather than the criminal justice system that established innocence” (“A Question of Innocence”). This means that since 1973, the United States has wrongly convicted 123 people of capital crimes. According to a study by the American Civil Liberties Union, about one in every twenty inmates who have been sentenced to death since 1973 is innocent. And this is only what has been found so far. Imagine how many more innocents are waiting on the death row.
    To conclude, the death penalty is immoral and ineffective. It increases the amount of murders in our country, is unfair because of discrimination, and innocents can be killed. Everyone has the right to life, and the government shouldn’t endorse what it opposes. How will executing someone teach people that killing is wrong? People should only ever die of natural causes. The justice system shouldn’t sink to the level of murderers. To help this cause, please vote for politicians that do not support the death penalty and write letters to your state government saying that the system Wisconsin has in place now is the right one for everyone.



Works Cited:

"A Question of Innocence." American Civil Liberties Union. 09 Dec. 2003. 18 Mar. 2007     <link>.


"Death Penalty Arguments." Pro Death Penalty. 03 May 2001. 18 Mar. 2007     <link>.


"Death Penalty Facts." Murder Victims' Families for Reconciliation, Inc. 2006. 18 Mar.     2007 <link>.

"Death Penalty Information Center." Death Penalty Information Center. 21 Mar. 2007. 18     Mar. 2007 <link>.

"Death Penalty Information Center." DPIC. 18 Mar. 2007     <link>.

Porter, Phil. "The Economics of Capital Punishment." Mind Spring. 1998. 18 Mar. 2007     <link>.

"To Kill or Not to Kill." Ebsco Host. 17 Mar. 2007 <link>.


Uniform Crime Reports. 03 Oct. 1993. 18 Mar. 2007     <link>.
Yes, this does show only the US.  Only place I could find reliable info on :(
Yes, this does show only the US. Only place I could find reliable info on :(
added by ThePrincesTale
Source: Jürgen Tomicek
Trump's secretary of education says she's "undeterred." John Stossel interviews Betsy DeVos for Reason, May 2018.
video
debate
issues
school
education
charter
public
secretary of education
betsy devos
john stossel
interview
reason
2018
Susette Kelo bought a run-down home. She fixed it up and painted it pink. Then the government came and took it. Stossel on eminent domain and the movie Little Pink House.
video
debate
issues
politics
government
eminent domain
little pink house
susette kelo
kelo v. city of new london
john stossel
reason
april 2018
added by DarkSarcasm
Penn & Teller explain the 2nd Amendment.
video
debate
issues
second amendment
2nd amendment
gun control
right to bear arms
militia
penn & teller
added by DarkSarcasm
There's a lot of talk about politicians being "bought and sold", and about "crony capitalism". What do those terms mean? Why should we care? Author Jay Cost of The Weekly Standard for Prager University, Feb 2016.
video
debate
issues
politics
crony capitalism
crapitalism
government
politicians
lobbyists
prager u
2016
Trust in the media is at an all-time low. But should it be? Why do fewer and fewer Americans trust the mainstream media. Investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson, author of The Smear, explains for PragerU.
video
debate
issues
politics
media
news
mainstream media
journalism
bias
sharyl attkisson
prager university
2017
The Affordable Care Act drove thousands of independent doctors to throw in the towel and join large hospital networks. However, a growing movement of doctors are fighting back against the bureaucratic system. Reason, October 2017.
video
debate
issues
health care
health insurance
obamacare
affordable care act
direct primary care
doctors
reason
october 2017
added by DarkSarcasm
Introducing Wokes, sizeless, style-neutral, gender non-conforming denim for a generation that defies labels. From SNL, 30 Sept 2017.
video
debate
issues
gender
size
style
neutral
woke
jeans
levi's
parody
saturday night live
snl
september 2017
added by ThePrincesTale
added by Cinders
Source: DC/Marvel
added by Cinders
Source: Meme
added by DarkSarcasm
Source: The Free Thought Project
added by DarkSarcasm
Source: National Archives and Records Administration
added by zanhar1
Source: zenpencils
added by ThePrincesTale
added by ThePrincesTale
added by ThePrincesTale
Source: https://www.facebook.com/humansofnewyork/?fref=ts
added by ThePrincesTale
Source: https://twitter.com/kumailn
Escape the filter bubble.
video
donald trump
hillary clinton
election 2016
liberal
conservative
bias
filter bubble
echo chamber
liar